The HALO test is meant to be used as a risk assessment tool, not a cancer detection test - it primarily meant for women under the age of about 40 (in whom routine mammography is not performed). The idea is that if there are abnormal cells lining the milk ducts, they may be detected in the fluid obtained from the test. If there are abnormal cells, that generally signifies an increased risk of developing cancer, and additional testing (perhaps MRI) may be indicated.
When properly performed, as many as 50% of women will not produce fluid with the HALO test, and in young women, this is considered a "negative" result (no abnormality). However with the normal aging process, there can be atrophy of the milk ducts, so that in women over the age of 40-50, no fluid might be due to changes related to age, and not necessarily a negative result. In addition, the HALO test will probably not pick up abnormal cells even if a cancer is present if the tumor is in the outer aspects of the breast. Lobular cancer (as it is not growing initially in the milk ducts) also will not likely be picked up with the HALO test.
The HALO test is not for everyone and again it is important to stress that this test is not meant to be a screening test for breast cancer, and is not a substitute for clinical and self-examination as well as routine imaging such as mammogram (and ultrasound / MRI if indicated). However when used appropriately it can be helpful to provide some counseling to young women regarding their risk.
The HALO test is meant to be used as a risk assessment tool, not a cancer detection test - it primarily meant for women under the age of about 40 (in whom routine mammography is not performed). The idea is that if there are abnormal cells lining the milk ducts, they may be detected in the fluid obtained from the test. If there are abnormal cells, that generally signifies an increased risk of developing cancer, and additional testing (perhaps MRI) may be indicated.
When properly performed, as many as 50% of women will not produce fluid with the HALO test, and in young women, this is considered a "negative" result (no abnormality). However with the normal aging process, there can be atrophy of the milk ducts, so that in women over the age of 40-50, no fluid might be due to changes related to age, and not necessarily a negative result. In addition, the HALO test will probably not pick up abnormal cells even if a cancer is present if the tumor is in the outer aspects of the breast. Lobular cancer (as it is not growing initially in the milk ducts) also will not likely be picked up with the HALO test.
The HALO test is not for everyone and again it is important to stress that this test is not meant to be a screening test for breast cancer, and is not a substitute for clinical and self-examination as well as routine imaging such as mammogram (and ultrasound / MRI if indicated). However when used appropriately it can be helpful to provide some counseling to young women regarding their risk.
murray (Friend) voted for answer by DrAttai (Physician - Surgery - Breast (Verified))
Call SHARE at: 866-891-2392
to speak directly to a trained breast cancer survivor for support and guidance.
3 Quick Ways You Can Help
1) Spread the word! Tell people you think might want some support. Tell medical professionals, health providers, and organizations.
2) Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter! 3) Volunteer - email us at volunteer@talkabouthealth.com for more information.
When properly performed, as many as 50% of women will not produce fluid with the HALO test, and in young women, this is considered a "negative" result (no abnormality). However with the normal aging process, there can be atrophy of the milk ducts, so that in women over the age of 40-50, no fluid might be due to changes related to age, and not necessarily a negative result. In addition, the HALO test will probably not pick up abnormal cells even if a cancer is present if the tumor is in the outer aspects of the breast. Lobular cancer (as it is not growing initially in the milk ducts) also will not likely be picked up with the HALO test.
The HALO test is not for everyone and again it is important to stress that this test is not meant to be a screening test for breast cancer, and is not a substitute for clinical and self-examination as well as routine imaging such as mammogram (and ultrasound / MRI if indicated). However when used appropriately it can be helpful to provide some counseling to young women regarding their risk. The HALO test is meant to be used as a risk assessment tool, not a cancer detection test - it primarily meant for women under the age of about 40 (in whom routine mammography is not performed). The idea is that if there are abnormal cells lining the milk ducts, they may be detected in the fluid obtained from the test. If there are abnormal cells, that generally signifies an increased risk of developing cancer, and additional testing (perhaps MRI) may be indicated.
When properly performed, as many as 50% of women will not produce fluid with the HALO test, and in young women, this is considered a "negative" result (no abnormality). However with the normal aging process, there can be atrophy of the milk ducts, so that in women over the age of 40-50, no fluid might be due to changes related to age, and not necessarily a negative result. In addition, the HALO test will probably not pick up abnormal cells even if a cancer is present if the tumor is in the outer aspects of the breast. Lobular cancer (as it is not growing initially in the milk ducts) also will not likely be picked up with the HALO test.
The HALO test is not for everyone and again it is important to stress that this test is not meant to be a screening test for breast cancer, and is not a substitute for clinical and self-examination as well as routine imaging such as mammogram (and ultrasound / MRI if indicated). However when used appropriately it can be helpful to provide some counseling to young women regarding their risk.
Note: Usernames have been made anonymous and profile images are not shown to protect the privacy of our members.