I was dx'd w/ invasive BC under age 50-my mom (no history when dx'd under 50, stg 3). What is your opinion on the screening guidelines for women in their 40's?
Diseases:
Diseases:
1
Expert AnswersZevaHermanMD (Physician - Radiology (Verified) ) - 12 / 04 / 2011
These are the guidelines:
For the general population, no family history of breast cancer:
Baseline mammogram at age 35 or 37. Mammograms every 1-2 years from 40-50, annual mammography above age 50.
I am sure that you are aware that there is a great deal of controversy regarding annual mammograms in the 40's. I believe that they should definitely be done. It is true that cancer is less common in this age group compared with women above 50, but unfortunatley we do see many cases in young women. Statistically, some argue that the mammograms are not reducing mortality, or saving lives. Well, in my opinion this is not the only criteria to measure, for example if you found an early cancer in a 46 year old women which will only require lumpectomy, but not mastectomy, or chemotherapy, (which might be the case had this only be diagnosed 4 years later), then we have done a great service to this patient and her quality of life. It is true that some of the cases diagnosed in the young women are particularly aggressive, and that the early detection may not save her life, but I do not think this is a reason for not offering it. Furthermore, some of the studies discouraging mammography discuss the anxiety related to additional workups (magnification views and spot views) and unnecessary biopsies, all valid arguments. But the anxiety can be allayed with proper discussions and education, and we are working on not biopsying findings that are not worrisome. But it is true that most biopsies are negative, still... we are doing our best with the technology we have, this may change in the future. I do not know the number of cancers I have identified in women under 50, on screening, but it is great! It is true that I have also biopsied many many benign nodules and calcifications, this is the trade-off.
In women with dense breasts and/or a family history of breast cancer, screening sonography should also be performed annually. Sonography may increase detection by 30% or so.
In women with a strong family history, or personal history of breast cancer, screening MRI should be performed, as well.
If both you and your mother have had premenopausal breast cancer, then genetic testing should probably be performed.
Good luck to you and your mom.
For the general population, no family history of breast cancer:
Baseline mammogram at age 35 or 37. Mammograms every 1-2 years from 40-50, annual mammography above age 50.
I am sure that you are aware that there is a great deal of controversy regarding annual mammograms in the 40's. I believe that they should definitely be done. It is true that cancer is less common in this age group compared with women above 50, but unfortunatley we do see many cases in young women. Statistically, some argue that the mammograms are not reducing mortality, or saving lives. Well, in my opinion this is not the only criteria to measure, for example if you found an early cancer in a 46 year old women which will only require lumpectomy, but not mastectomy, or chemotherapy, (which might be the case had this only be diagnosed 4 years later), then we have done a great service to this patient and her quality of life. It is true that some of the cases diagnosed in the young women are particularly aggressive, and that the early detection may not save her life, but I do not think this is a reason for not offering it. Furthermore, some of the studies discouraging mammography discuss the anxiety related to additional workups (magnification views and spot views) and unnecessary biopsies, all valid arguments. But the anxiety can be allayed with proper discussions and education, and we are working on not biopsying findings that are not worrisome. But it is true that most biopsies are negative, still... we are doing our best with the technology we have, this may change in the future. I do not know the number of cancers I have identified in women under 50, on screening, but it is great! It is true that I have also biopsied many many benign nodules and calcifications, this is the trade-off.
In women with dense breasts and/or a family history of breast cancer, screening sonography should also be performed annually. Sonography may increase detection by 30% or so.
In women with a strong family history, or personal history of breast cancer, screening MRI should be performed, as well.
If both you and your mother have had premenopausal breast cancer, then genetic testing should probably be performed.
Good luck to you and your mom.
Similar Questions
Note: All content on this site is informational and not a substitute for professional medical advice.
Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with questions regarding your health.
Note: Usernames have been made anonymous and profile images are not shown to protect the privacy of our members.
Thank you for flagging this content. We will look into it right away.

Add Answer

1) Question:
2) Background Info (optional): What context or background information is relevant to this request?
Notes:
The more clear and thorough your request, the more likely you will receive support.
Many of our members are learning from this information or english might not be their first language. Please use standard english and spell out all words. For example, use 'you' instead of 'u'.
The more clear and thorough your request, the more likely you will receive support.
Many of our members are learning from this information or english might not be their first language. Please use standard english and spell out all words. For example, use 'you' instead of 'u'.
Newsletters


Join Now



Similar Questions
Updates











